IAM TechSoD Conflict Spot-Check
A focused 60-minute session working through your segregation-of-duties conflicts directly with a specialist — a scoped, paid way in when you have a specific problem, not an open-ended conversation.
What this actually is
The same person being able to both approve and pay a claim, provision access and certify it, or raise a purchase order and approve it — segregation-of-duties conflicts are one of the most common findings in any access review, and usually the first thing an auditor asks about.
This is a single, focused 60-minute call. You bring what you have — a role list, an access matrix, an org chart, or just a description of how a few critical processes work — and we work through where the real conflicts are, which ones actually matter, and what a sensible first fix looks like. Booked directly, no proposal process first.
What's included
- A 60-minute session, one-to-one with a specialist consultant — not a first-line call handler
- A working review of your highest-risk conflict pairs — approve/pay, request/approve, provision/certify, and the equivalents specific to your processes
- A clear, prioritised view of which conflicts genuinely need remediation versus which are lower-risk or already mitigated by compensating controls
- Straight talk on whether this is a quick fix, a role-redesign problem, or something a platform should be enforcing automatically
What this isn't
- Not free — this is a paid, expert-led session, not an instant self-serve tool
- Not an automated scan of your platform — it's a conversation, built on what you already know about your own processes
- Not a substitute for ongoing segregation-of-duties monitoring and remediation — that's real delivery work as part of running your governance programme; this is one hour of expert judgment on where you stand today
Who this is for
Teams who already know segregation-of-duties conflicts are a live problem — flagged by an auditor, surfaced in an access review, or simply suspected but never formally checked — and want a specialist's read on it quickly, without first scoping a larger engagement.
See how we think about RBAC vs ABAC and SoD design →